AAAS, 1998. A Framework for Federal Science Polcy. Board of Directors, American Association for the Advancement of Science, May.
AAAS, 2004. Defense and Homeland Security R&D Hit New Highs in 2005; Growth Slows for Other Agencies. American Association for the Advancement of Science, November 29.
Abbey, G. and N. Lane, 2005. United States Space Policy: Challenges and Opportunities. American Academy of Arts and Sciences, A report of the Reconsidering the Rules of Space Project.
Branscomb, L. and R. Florida, 1998. Challenges to Technology Policy in a Changing World Economy. In: L. Branscomb and J. Keller (eds.) Investing in Innovation: Creating a Research and Innovation Policy That Works, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 3-39.
Bush, V., 1945. Science the Endless Frontier, A Report to the President. United States Government Printing Office, Washington:, DC, July.
Carney, J. 2004. An Political and Policy Context for the FY 2004 Budget. Chapter 2 in AAAS Report XXIX: Research and Development FY 2005.
Crow, M., 2001. Linking Scientific Research to Societal Outcomes. Chapter 10 in A. Teich et al. (eds.) AAAS Science and Technology Policy Yearbook, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, pp. 129-131.
Ehlers, V., 1998. Unlocking Our Future: Toward a New National Science Policy. A Report to Congress by the House Committee on Science, September 24.
Executive Office of the President, 2002. The President's Management Agenda, FY 2002. Office of Management and Budget, S/N 041-001-00568-4, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Federation of American Scientists, 2004. Flying Blind: The Rise, Fall, and Possible Resurrection of Science Policy Advice in the United States. Occasional Paper No. 2, December.
Gough, M. (ed.), 2003. Politicizing Science. Hoover Institution Press, Stanford, CA.
Greenberg, D. 2001. Science, Money, and Politics. University of Chicago Press.
Guston, D.H., 2000. Retiring the Social Contract for Science. Issues in Science and Technology, Summer.
Kitcher, P. 2001. Science, Truth, and Democracy. Oxford University Press.
Koizumi, K. 2004. R&D Trends and Special Analyses. Chapter 3 in AAAS Report XXIX: Research and Development FY 2005.
Lane, N., 2005. Introduction: Energy, the Environment, and Global Change. Part 6 in: Vision 2033: Linking Science and Policy for Tomorrow’s World, Proceedings from the AAAS Science and Technology Policy Fellowship Programs.
Lane, N. and T. Kalil, 2005. The National Nanotechnology Initiative: Present at the Creation. Issues in Science and Technology, Summer, 49-55.
Marburger, J., 2005. Policy, Politics, and Science in the White House: Conversations with Presidential Science Advisors, University of Colorado, February 14.
Marburger, J., An Investment in the Future.
Marburger, J., A New Paradigm for Space Exploration.
Marburger, J., The U.S. Climate Change Vision.
National Research Council, 1999. Capitalizing on Investments in Science and Technology. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy, National Academy Press.
National Research Council, 2004. Science and Technology in the National Interest: Ensuring the Best Presidential and Federal Advisory Committee Science and Technology Appointments, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
Office of Science and Technology Policy, Executive Office of the President.
Office of Science and Technology Policy, 2004. Statement from President Bush’s Science Advisor and Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy John H. Marburger III on the Union of Concerned Scientists Document, February 18.
Office of Science and Technology Policy, 2004. Statement from President Bush’s Science Advisor and Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy John H. Marburger III on the Union of Concerned Scientists Document and Press Release, July 8.
Pielke, Jr., R.A., 2004. The End of Research? A Perspective for the Consortium for Science, Policy, and Outcomes. Arizona State University, http://www.cspo.org, October.
Pielke, Jr., R.A. (ed.), 2004. Report on the Misuse of Science in the Administrations of George H.W. Bush (1989-1993) and William J. Clinton (1993-2001). By the Students in ENVS 4800, Maymester 2004, University of Colorado, June.
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, 2002. Assessing the U.S. R&D Investment, Office of the President.
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, 2003. Technology Transfer of Federally Funded R&D. Office of the President.
Revkin, A., 2004. Bush vs. the Laureates: How Science Became a Partisan Issue. NY Times, October 19.
Sarewitz, D., 1996. Frontiers of Illusion. Temple University Press.
Sarewitz, D., 2000. Human Well-being and Federal Science-What's the Connection. In D.L. Kleinman, ed., Science, Technology, and Democracy, SUNY Press, Albany, pp. 87-102.
Smith, D., 2005. Political Science. NYTimes, September 4.
Smith, M. S., 2002. Science and Technology Policy: Issues for the 107th Congress. Second Session, Congressional Research Service.
Teich, A.H., and K. Koizumi, 2004. An Introduction to R&D in the FY 2005 Budget. Chapter 1 in AAAS Report XXIX: Research and Development FY 2005.
Union of Concerned Scientists, 2004. Scientific Integrity in Policy making: An Investigation into the Bush Administration's Misuse of Science. Union of Concerned Scientists, March.
Union of Concerned Scientists, 2004. Scientific Integrity in Policy making: Further Investigation of the Bush Administration's Misuse of Science. Union of Concerned Scientists, July.
U.S. GAO, 2004. Federal Advisory Committees: Additional Guidance Could Help Agencies Better Ensure Independence and Balance. United States General Accounting Office, Report to Congressional Requesters, GAO-04-328.
U.S. GAO, 2004. Legal Principles Applicable to Selection of Federal Advisory Committee Members. B-303767, October 18.
Waxman, H., 2003. Politics and science in the Bush Administration. U.S.House of Representatives, Committee of Government Reform, Politics and Science, November 13.