October 24, 2007
Prins and Rayner in Nature
Posted to Author: Pielke Jr., R. | Climate Change
Gwyn Prins, of the London School of Economics, and Steve Rayner, of Oxford University have a brave and challenging piece in the current issue of Nature on why we need to rethink climate policy. Here is how it begins:
The Kyoto Protocol is a symbolically important expression of governments' concern about climate change. But as an instrument for achieving emissions reductions, it has failed. It has produced no demonstrable reductions in emissions or even in anticipated emissions growth. And it pays no more than token attention to the needs of societies to adapt to existing climate change. The impending United Nations Climate Change Conference being held in Bali in December — to decide international policy after 2012 — needs to radically rethink climate policy.
Read the whole thing free on the Nature site.Posted on October 24, 2007 02:13 PM
I found the Prins and Rayner article refreshing and as you point out, it is a brave attempt to apply common sense to climate policy. I wish them and like minded individuals a lot of luck. To illustrate the point, in one of my early internet searches I typed in the words “global waming” instead of global warming. The site that was retrieved at the top of the Google heap was one from the Vegan Society which showed how becoming a vegan would help me fight global warming. There were many special interest sites below the vegans. (Apparently, each was trying to capture the numerous internet surfers who can’t spell).
The entire global warming/climate change issue has become a huge political choo choo train. There is absolutely no end to the people and political interest groups who have hooked their private rail cars on to it. The science that spawned the political movement has seemingly become an afterthought.
Dr. Pielke, I know you have been a proponent of adaptation for many years. This seems like a reasonable thing to do no matter who wins the scientific debate. The world will get hotter. Droughts and hurricanes will occur. Finding a way to lessen the local human suffering from these things sounds a lot easier than trying to act as worldwide carbon police force.
Posted by: SciBuff at October 24, 2007 06:54 PM
I find their own "solution" however to be largely unworkable. Putting the U.S federal government on a "wartime footing" means the federal government starts TELLING energy companies what to research, in the way Roosevelt TOLD the auto companies that they were to start making tanks to aid the wartime effort in WWII. Good luck with that.
Posted by: bigcitylib at October 25, 2007 01:24 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)