|
|||||||||||
May 10, 2007Reorienting U.S. Climate Science PoliciesPosted to Author: Pielke Jr., R. | Climate Change | R&D Funding | Scientific Assessments Last week the House Committee on Science and Technology held an important hearing on the future direction of climate research in he United States (PDF). The major scientific debate is settled. Climate change is occurring. It is impacting our nation and the rest of the world and will continue to impact us into the future. The USGCRP should move beyond an emphasis on addressing uncertainties and refining climate science. In addition the Program needs to provide information that supports action to reduce vulnerability to climate and other global changes and facilitates the development of adaptation and mitigation strategies that can be applied here in the U.S. and in other vulnerable locations throughout the world. This refocusing of climate research is timely and worthwhile. Kudos to the S&T Committee. For a number of years, Congressman Mark Udall (D-CO) has led efforts to make the nation's climate research enterprise more responsive to the needs of decision makers (joined by Bob Inglis (R-SC)). Mr. Udall explained the reasons for rethinking climate science as follows: The evolution of global science and the global change issue sparked the need to make changes to the 1978 National Climate Program Act, and gave us the Global Change Research Act of 1990. It is now time for another adjustment to alter the focus of the program governed by this law. The hearing charter (PDF) is worth reading in full. Posted on May 10, 2007 03:50 AMCommentsHmmm. That first line - "The major scientific debate is settled." reminds of another famous line from somewhere. Now I remember. Was there, by chance, a "Mission Accomplished" poster behind the chairman at the hearing? Posted by: BobKC And none too soon. The carbon traders need to get the show on the road before everybody realizes that despite the theory, "global warming" seems to have stopped in its tracks, and there's a lot more to the anthropogenic effects than ghg's anyway... ;-) Posted by: Harry Haymuss It will be interesting to see what climate actually _does_ once we start limiting/reducing emissions. Posted by: Jason at May 15, 2007 08:45 AM |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||